From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 22, 2017
233 So. 3d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. 3D17–1591

11-22-2017

Eric WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Eric Williams, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Eric J. Eves, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Eric Williams, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Eric J. Eves, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.The order under review denying relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 is reversed and remanded. Upon remand, if the trial court finds the motion is facially sufficient and timely, and that Defendant is entitled to relief, it shall grant the motion; if it finds the motion facially insufficient, it shall identify the defects and provide the Defendant an opportunity to amend; if the court finds the motion should be denied, it shall attach to the order those portions of the files and records that conclusively show the defendant is entitled to no relief, as required by Rule 3.801(e) (incorporating provisions of Rule 3.850 (e), (f), (j), (k), and (n)).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 22, 2017
233 So. 3d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eric WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 22, 2017

Citations

233 So. 3d 1172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)