From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 1, 2017
232 So. 3d 1156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 5D17–1919

12-01-2017

Coty WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Coty Williams, Okeechobee, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Coty Williams, Okeechobee, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Coty Williams, appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, which alleged multiple grounds for relief. We find that Williams is entitled to an opportunity to amend his third and fifth grounds for relief. See Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754, 761 (Fla. 2007) (holding that a defendant who files a legally insufficient rule 3.850 motion for failing to meet pleading requirements should be allowed at least one opportunity to amend); see also Ferris v. State, 996 So.2d 228, 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (requiring an opportunity to amend because "the trial court did not deny the claim on the basis of facial insufficiency, and, as such, the appellant could not have been aware of the application of Spera to this issue"). We affirm Williams's remaining grounds on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

PALMER, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 1, 2017
232 So. 3d 1156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Coty WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Dec 1, 2017

Citations

232 So. 3d 1156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)