Opinion
SC21-832
10-01-2021
Lower Tribunal No(s).: 352000CF002130AXXXXX; 352011CF000105AXXXXX; 5D21-1368; 5D21-1745; 5D21-1749; 5D21-1750
The petition for writ of prohibition is hereby denied because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that a lower court is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction. See Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So.2d 850 (Fla. 1992); English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla. 1977).
Additionally, to the extent that Petitioner seeks mandamus relief, because Petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to relief, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000).
Petitioner's certiorari petitions are treated as all writs petitions and are hereby denied.
All pending motions are denied. No motion for rehearing will be entertained by the Court.
CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
HON. HEIDI DAVIS, JUDGE