From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Feb 18, 2020
593 S.W.3d 142 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107628

02-18-2020

Jared Martell WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Emily Danker-Feldman, Rosenblum Schwartz & Fry, 120 S. Central Ave., Suite 130, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant. Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Emily Danker-Feldman, Rosenblum Schwartz & Fry, 120 S. Central Ave., Suite 130, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM. Jared Martell Williams appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Feb 18, 2020
593 S.W.3d 142 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jared Martell WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Feb 18, 2020

Citations

593 S.W.3d 142 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)