From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
Mar 18, 2020
NO. 12-20-00064-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2020)

Opinion

NO. 12-20-00064-CR

03-18-2020

JOSHUA WILLIAMS, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE


APPEAL FROM THE 114TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SMITH COUNTY , TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION

Joshua Williams, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal from his conviction for solicitation of a child in trial court cause number 114-0165-19. Under the rules of appellate procedure, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order; or within ninety days if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Rule 26.3 provides that a motion to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal must be filed within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Here, sentence was imposed on May 28, 2019, and Appellant filed his notice of appeal on February 26, 2020, long after the time for filing a notice of appeal under Rule 26.2(a) or for seeking a motion to extend under Rule 26.3. Appellant also filed a motion for leave to file his notice of appeal, in which he alleges a claim of new evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel, and claims to have been a victim of entrapment and entered an involuntary and unlawful plea bargain.

Even assuming Appellant filed a motion for new trial, his notice of appeal is still untimely. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.4(a) (motion for new trial must be filed no later than thirty days after sentenced imposed or suspended in open court), 26.2(a), 26.3.

On February 27, this Court notified Appellant that the information received failed to show the jurisdiction of the Court, i.e., there was no notice of appeal filed within the time allowed by the rules of appellate procedure and no timely motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, 26.3. We informed Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless the information was amended on or before March 9 to show this Court's jurisdiction. This deadline expired without an amended notice of appeal or other response from Appellant.

"[I]n Texas, appeals by either the State or the defendant in a criminal case are permitted only when they are specifically authorized by statute." State ex rel. Lykos v. Fine , 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). This Court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as provided by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, 26.3; see also Slaton v . State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Accordingly, we dismiss Appellant's appeal for want of jurisdiction and overrule his motion for leave. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). Opinion delivered March 18, 2020.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

Only the court of criminal appeals has jurisdiction to grant an out-of-time appeal. See Ater v . Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); see also Kossie v . State , No. 01-16-00738-CR, 2017 WL 631842, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 16, 2017, no pet. h.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing for lack of jurisdiction because appellant could not pursue out of time appeal without permission from court of criminal appeals); see TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art 11.07 § 3(a) (West 2005).

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Appeal from the 114th District Court of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 114-0165-19)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that it is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
Mar 18, 2020
NO. 12-20-00064-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA WILLIAMS, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

Date published: Mar 18, 2020

Citations

NO. 12-20-00064-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2020)