From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Smith

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 24, 2011
CASE NO.: 1:09CV495 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 24, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:09CV495.

January 24, 2011


ORDER AND DECISION


The Court has examined the Report and Recommended Decision of Magistrate Judge Pearson, submitted in this matter on December 23, 2010. Doc. 14. Upon due consideration, and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the Report and recommended findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates them herein. Therefore, it is ordered that petition is hereby DISMISSED.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Court's decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

January 24, 2011


Summaries of

Williams v. Smith

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 24, 2011
CASE NO.: 1:09CV495 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:MICAH WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. KEITH SMITH, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 24, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:09CV495 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 24, 2011)

Citing Cases

Rarden v. Warden

As for the conclusion that Petitioner's talismanic constitutional phrases like "fair trial" and "due process"…

Rarden v. Warden, Warren Corr. Inst.

Even if this claim were not procedurally defaulted it would be without merit. Petitioner's argument of the…