From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Sloan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 1, 2012
5:12-cv-238-DPM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Oct. 1, 2012)

Opinion

5:12-cv-238-DPM-JTK

10-01-2012

THELMA WILLIAMS ADC #93197 PLAINTIFF v. D.L. SLOAN et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Kearney's Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Document No. 15, and Thelma Williams's objection with attached exhibits, Document No. 18. After conducting a de novo review, the Court adopts Judge Kearney's recommended disposition as its own. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Defendants Correctional Medical Services, Green, Cook, Stratton, Kelley, Jackson, Hill, Davis, Duck, Williams, and Robertson are dismissed from this action without prejudice. Aside from the food poisoning claim, which falls within the imminent-danger exception to the Prison Litigation Reform Act's three-strike rule, all other claims against Sloan and Manchbanks are dismissed without prejudice.

If Williams wishes to proceed with the dismissed claims and against dismissed defendants in this case, he must, within thirty days of the entry of this Order: (1) pay the statutory filing fee of $350 in full, noting the case style and number; and (2) file a motion to amend and reassert these allegations. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

So Ordered.

_______________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Sloan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 1, 2012
5:12-cv-238-DPM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Oct. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. Sloan

Case Details

Full title:THELMA WILLIAMS ADC #93197 PLAINTIFF v. D.L. SLOAN et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Oct 1, 2012

Citations

5:12-cv-238-DPM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Oct. 1, 2012)