From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Sloan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Dec 17, 2012
5:12-cv-238-DPM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2012)

Opinion

5:12-cv-238-DPM-JTK

12-17-2012

THELMA WILLIAMS ADC #93197 PLAINTIFF v. D.L. SLOAN, Maximum Security Unit, ADC and MANCH BANKS, Sgt., Maximum Security Unit, ADC DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Kearney's Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Document No. 35. No one has objected. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b), and for legal error, the Court adopts the proposal as its own. Williams asked the Court to order Defendants not to retaliate against him for filing this lawsuit. Williams has been released from ADC incarceration, so his request for preliminary injunctive relief, Document No. 8, is denied as moot.

So Ordered.

______________________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Sloan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Dec 17, 2012
5:12-cv-238-DPM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. Sloan

Case Details

Full title:THELMA WILLIAMS ADC #93197 PLAINTIFF v. D.L. SLOAN, Maximum Security Unit…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Dec 17, 2012

Citations

5:12-cv-238-DPM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Dec. 17, 2012)