From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Shannon

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 21, 2021
255 A.3d 1268 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021)

Summary

In Williams, this Court considered whether a plaintiff who made no efforts to serve a writ of summons beyond emailing a copy of the filing to the defendant's insurance carrier had complied with Lamp.

Summary of this case from Senyk v. Ukrainian Catholic Archeparchy of Phila.

Opinion

No. 2083 MDA 2019

05-21-2021

James C. WILLIAMS, M.W., a Minor, by James C. Williams, Guardian and Father, and J.W., a Minor, by James C. Williams, Guardian and Father, Appellant v. Hunter SHANNON and John Preston Shannon



Non-Precedential Decision

See Pa. Superior Court Internal operating Procedures, § 65.37 before citing

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Williams v. Shannon

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 21, 2021
255 A.3d 1268 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021)

In Williams, this Court considered whether a plaintiff who made no efforts to serve a writ of summons beyond emailing a copy of the filing to the defendant's insurance carrier had complied with Lamp.

Summary of this case from Senyk v. Ukrainian Catholic Archeparchy of Phila.
Case details for

Williams v. Shannon

Case Details

Full title:JAMES C. WILLIAMS, M.W., A MINOR, BY JAMES C. WILLIAMS, GUARDIAN AND…

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 21, 2021

Citations

255 A.3d 1268 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021)

Citing Cases

Senyk v. Ukrainian Catholic Archeparchy of Phila.

Generally, "communication between a plaintiff and a defendant's insurance carrier does not qualify as a good…