From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Select Specialty Hospital-Nashville, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jan 7, 2010
Civil No. 3:08-1007 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:08-1007.

January 7, 2010


ORDER


On December 2, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 50), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by the defendant (Docket No. 42) is GRANTED, and the claims of plaintiffs Angela R. Williams, Kelley K. Foxworth and Zakkiyyah C. Holmes are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that the defendant's request for default against plaintiff Holmes on the defendant's Counterclaim is DENIED, and the defendant's Counterclaim against plaintiff Holmes is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

The trials of these claims scheduled for March 2 and March 30, 2010, and the accompanying pretrial conferences scheduled for February 26, 2010 and March 26, 2010 are CANCELLED and removed from the court's calendar.

The Bill of Costs filed by the defendant (Docket No. 56) will be handled by the Clerk. The defendant's Notice of Attorney's Fees and Expenses (Docket No. 57) is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Griffin for disposition under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72, FED.R.CIV.P.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Select Specialty Hospital-Nashville, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jan 7, 2010
Civil No. 3:08-1007 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Williams v. Select Specialty Hospital-Nashville, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA R. WILLIAMS, KELLEY K. FOXWORTH, and ZAKKIYYAH C. HOLMES…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Jan 7, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 3:08-1007 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2010)

Citing Cases

Vasser v. Shiroki N. Am., Inc.

When “[p]resented with a record of sufficiently egregious conduct . . . a district court has not abused its…

Thompson v. Direct Gen. Consumer Prods., Inc.

First, the non-responsive opt-in Plaintiffs acted wilfully and with fault because they did not comply with…