From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Omera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 1993
190 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 23, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.).


Plaintiff passenger was injured when two taxis collided. After being released from Harlem Hospital, plaintiff continued treatment with a private physician for four months. The defendants subsequently moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint maintaining plaintiff did not have a serious injury as defined in Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Plaintiff demonstrated that she had an impairment that substantially prevented her from performing her usual and customary activities for more than 90 days during the 180 days after the accident (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; Gleissner v LoPresti, 135 A.D.2d 494). The medical affidavits submitted by plaintiff's physician stated that she could not care for her daughter, do her housework, and that she was restricted to bedrest and limited physical activity for four months. Accordingly, the IAS Court properly denied defendants' motion.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Williams v. Omera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 1993
190 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Williams v. Omera

Case Details

Full title:CAROL WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. PETER J. OMERA et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
593 N.Y.S.2d 821

Citing Cases

Randhawa v. Otero

See, e.g., Gleissner v. LoPresti, 521 N.Y.S.2d 735, 736 (App.Div. 1987) (evidence established that the…

Padilla v. Style Management Co., Inc.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J., and a jury). In this trial on the issue…