From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1932
164 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1932)

Opinion

(Filed 15 June, 1932.)

CIVIL ACTION, before Finley, J., at January Term, 1932, of GASTON.

J. L. Hamme for plaintiff.

S. J. Durham for defendant.


Plaintiff alleged that the defendant is a corporation operating a large industrial plant in Gaston County and owns certain tenement houses constructed for the use of its employees. It was further alleged that after dark on 5 January, 1931, the plaintiff visited the home of one Brown, who occupied one of the houses so owned and maintained by the defendant, and that as she attempted to enter the house the steps thereto "gave way, violently precipitating this plaintiff to the ground, inflicting injury as hereinafter alleged." It was further alleged that "the defendant licensed this plaintiff and the general public to use on or about 5 January, 1931, said steps," etc.

The defendant demurred ore tenus upon the ground that the complaint stated no cause of action. The demurrer was sustained and the plaintiff excepted and appealed.


The demurrer was properly sustained upon authority of Money v. Hotel Co., 174 N.C. 508, 93 S.E. 964, and Tucker v. Yarn Mill Co., 194 N.C. 756, 140 S.E. 744.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Williams v. Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1932
164 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1932)
Case details for

Williams v. Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MRS. NOLAR WILLIAMS v. OSAGE MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1932

Citations

164 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1932)
202 N.C. 859

Citing Cases

Money v. Hotel Co.

Affirmed. Cited: Jones v. Bland, 182 N.C. 73; Brigman v. Construction Co., 192 N.C. 794; Corp. Comm. v.…