From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. McDowell

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 14, 2022
CV 18-01101 JVS (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2022)

Opinion

CV 18-01101 JVS (RAO)

03-14-2022

STEPHEN JEROME WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JAMES V. SELNA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 8; the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), Dkt. No. 131; Plaintiff's Objection, Dkt. No. 136; Defendant Allen's Reply to Objection, Dkt. No. 137; the remaining Defendants' Reply to Objection, Dkt. No. 139; and all other records and files herein. Further, the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made.

The Court hereby accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend.


Summaries of

Williams v. McDowell

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 14, 2022
CV 18-01101 JVS (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN JEROME WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 14, 2022

Citations

CV 18-01101 JVS (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2022)