From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Matthews

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
May 13, 2004
No. 02-03-351-CV (Tex. App. May. 13, 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-03-351-CV

Delivered: May 13, 2004.

Appeal from the 236th District Court of Tarrant County.

Bernard Williams, pro se.

Armando Dediego, Lawe Offices of Armando Dediego, Dallas, TX, for appellees (Delisia Matthews).

Christopher John Doyle, Kassabian Doyle, P.C., Arlington, TX, for appellees (U-Haul Co. of Texas, and U-Haul Co. of Texas d/b/a U-Haul Westside Center).

PANEL D: McCOY, J., CAYCE, C.J., and LIVINGSTON, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On April 12, 2004, we notified appellant that its brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). See Tex.R.App.P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).


Summaries of

Williams v. Matthews

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
May 13, 2004
No. 02-03-351-CV (Tex. App. May. 13, 2004)
Case details for

Williams v. Matthews

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD WILLIAMS, Appellant v. DELISIA MATTHEWS, U-HAUL CO. OF TEXAS, AND…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: May 13, 2004

Citations

No. 02-03-351-CV (Tex. App. May. 13, 2004)