From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Marshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 3, 2015
Case No. CV 13-01551-AB (KK) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-01551-AB (KK)

12-03-2015

CHARLES A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MARSHALL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the: Fourth Amended Complaint; Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Yett, Steeb, Brumgarder, and Davis; relevant records on file; and Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Yett, Steeb, Brumgarder, and Davis is DENIED. /// /// /// /// ///

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Yett, Steeb, Bramgarder, and Davis file an Answer to the Fourth Amended Complaint no later than fourteen (14) days after the notice date of this Order. DATED: December 3, 2015

/s/_________

HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Marshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 3, 2015
Case No. CV 13-01551-AB (KK) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Williams v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MARSHALL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 3, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 13-01551-AB (KK) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2015)