Williams v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.

Full title: Emily Williams, Appellant, v. L'Oreal USA, Inc., Respondent.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 2, 2014

Appellate Case No. 2012-213713 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 2, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-213713 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-147

04-02-2014

Emily Williams, Appellant, v. L'Oreal USA, Inc., Respondent.

Eduardo Kelvin Curry, of The Curry Law Firm, LLC, of North Charleston, for Appellant. Joseph DuRant Thompson III and Sarah Patrick Spruill, both of Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, PA, of Charleston and Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Colleton County

Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Eduardo Kelvin Curry, of The Curry Law Firm, LLC, of North Charleston, for Appellant.

Joseph DuRant Thompson III and Sarah Patrick Spruill, both of Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, PA, of Charleston and Greenville, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Wilder Corp. v. Wilke, 330 S.C. 71, 76, 497 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1998) ("[A]n issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court] to be preserved for appellate review."). AFFIRMED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

FEW, C.J., and SHORT and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.