From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Lambright

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Feb 26, 2020
Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-342 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-342

02-26-2020

HAZEL WILLIAMS v. ALLEN M. LAMBRIGHT, AS SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, ET AL.


(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 22, 2020, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #23) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff's Emergency Motions (Dkts. #6; #7; #8; #9) be denied as moot, Plaintiff's "Motion for Adequate Assurance of Due Performance and for a More Definite Statement pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(E)" (Dkt. #10) be denied, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #21) be granted, and Plaintiff's suit be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's Emergency Motions (Dkts. #6; #7; #8; #9) are DENIED AS MOOT.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion for Adequate Assurance of Due Performance and for a More Definite Statement pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(E)" (Dkt. #10) is DENIED.

It is finally ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #21) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief and under the federal and/or state debt collection acts are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; Plaintiff's claim to compel arbitration is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.

All relief not previously granted is hereby denied.

The Clerk is directed to close this civil action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 26th day of February, 2020.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Lambright

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Feb 26, 2020
Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-342 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Williams v. Lambright

Case Details

Full title:HAZEL WILLIAMS v. ALLEN M. LAMBRIGHT, AS SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 26, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-342 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2020)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Lamar Cnty.

Thus, it is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff's claims against the unserved defendants be dismissed.”),…