From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. L.A. Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 10, 2011
Case No.: CV10-01417 ODW (FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: CV10-01417 ODW (FFMx)

08-10-2011

YOULANDA O. WILLIAMS Plaintiff, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a school district; and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive Defendant.

George E. Peterson, Esq., Bar No.: 054310 Avi Burkwitz, Esq., Bar No.: 217225 Diana Ratcliff, Esq., Bar No.: 228302 PETERSON • BRADFORD • BURKWITZ Attorneys for Defendant LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT


George E. Peterson, Esq., Bar No.: 054310

Avi Burkwitz, Esq., Bar No.: 217225

Diana Ratcliff, Esq., Bar No.: 228302

PETERSON BRADFORD • BURKWITZ

Attorneys for Defendant

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Assigned to the Hon.: Otis O. Wright II Courtroom 11

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON COSTS AWARDED

TO THE COURT AND PLAINTIFF, IN PRO SE:

Whereas on November 18, 2010, the Court granted Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint as to the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth causes of action, without prejudice, allowing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint;

Whereas on January 27, 2011, the Court granted Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint without prejudice, allowing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint;

Whereas on April 25, 2011, the Court granted Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, with prejudice; (See Exhibit "A")

Whereas Plaintiff Youlanda Williams, timely filed an appeal with respect to the Court's grant of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint;

Whereas on June 9, 2011, Plaintiff Youlanda Williams filed a Motion for a Stay of Taxation of Cost Pending Appeal;

Whereas on July 21, 2011, the Court denied Plaintiff's Motion for a Stay of Taxation of Cost Pending Appeal; (See Exhibit "B")

Whereas this Court granted Defendant, Los Angeles Unified School District $526.74 in costs; (See Exhibit "C")

Whereas Defendant seeks to collect the amount owed by Plaintiff for purposes of debt collection and have this amount reflected in one judgment;

It appearing by reason of said rulings of this Court, Defendant Los Angeles Unified School District is entitled to have judgment entered in its favor and have judgment entered against Plaintiff Youlanda Williams, the total award granted by the Court, $526.74.

NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED AND DECREED that said Plaintiff, Youlanda Williams, take nothing from said Defendant, Los Angeles Unified School District and that Defendant, Los Angeles Unified School District is entitled to costs from Plaintiff in the amount of $526.74.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Otis O. Wright II

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. L.A. Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 10, 2011
Case No.: CV10-01417 ODW (FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. L.A. Unified Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:YOULANDA O. WILLIAMS Plaintiff, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 10, 2011

Citations

Case No.: CV10-01417 ODW (FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)