From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Kwik Shake Dispenser Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 10, 1958
105 S.E.2d 457 (Ga. 1958)

Opinion

20207.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 9, 1958.

DECIDED OCTOBER 10, 1958.

Appellate procedure. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge Manning. June 5, 1958.

Howell C. Ravan, for plaintiff in error.

Hicks Henderson, contra.


The bill of exceptions assigns as error a judgment of the court sustaining the demurrers of the plaintiff to the defendant's answer and cross-action. Held: The dismissal of a cross-bill or answer is not such a final disposition of a cause as may be reviewed in this court. Code § 6-701, as amended by Ga. L. 1957, pp. 229-232; Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Terrell, 155 Ga. 374 ( 116 S.E. 793); White v. Chisolm, 160 Ga. 177 ( 127 S.E. 140); Byrd v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 184 Ga. 178 ( 190 S.E. 584); Darden v. Roberts, 193 Ga. 637 ( 19 S.E.2d 270); Sanders v. Sanders, 212 Ga. 244 ( 91 S.E.2d 604); Bowman v. Poole, 212 Ga. 697 ( 95 S.E.2d 375). The amendment to the rules of practice and procedure, approved January 19, 1957 (Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224-248), did not repeal or modify the rule that the dismissal of a cross-action on demurrer is not such a final judgment as may be reviewed by direct bill of exceptions.

Writ of error dismissed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 9, 1958 — DECIDED OCTOBER 10, 1958.


Summaries of

Williams v. Kwik Shake Dispenser Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 10, 1958
105 S.E.2d 457 (Ga. 1958)
Case details for

Williams v. Kwik Shake Dispenser Manufacturing Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAMS v. KWIK SHAKE DISPENSER MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Oct 10, 1958

Citations

105 S.E.2d 457 (Ga. 1958)
105 S.E.2d 457

Citing Cases

Royal Oil Company, Inc. v. Hooks

PANNELL, Judge. Since the dismissal of an answer on demurrer is not such a final disposition of a cause as…

Ormewood Apartments, Inc v. McDonough Construction

There being no assignment of error on a final judgment, although it was alleged that a final judgment had…