Opinion
Case No. 3:15-cv-254
09-02-2015
District Judge Walter Herbert Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This case is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations of July 28, 2105 (ECF No. 3). Because the Plaintiff sought release from custody for herself and all similarly-situated Ohio women inmates, the Magistrate Judge concluded the case was required to be brought in habeas corpus, rather than under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Id. at PageID 52. Plaintiff was then ordered to re-file in habeas corpus. Id. The Magistrate Judge warned that if this were not done, the case would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Id.
Instead of filing an individual habeas corpus action, Plaintiff moved to amend, again seeking class action relief on behalf of herself on behalf of all Ohio inmates represented by counsel under the Ohio Public Defender system (ECF No. 6). On August 17, 2015, the Magistrate Judge denied the Motion to Amend in a detailed decision (ECF No. 7).
Ms. Williams has neither complied with nor objected to the Report and Recommendations. Nor has she objected to the denial of her Motion to Amend. The Court accordingly finds the Report and Recommendations well taken. The Complaint herein is ordered DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution. September 2, 2015.
*s/Thomas M. Rose
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge