From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Jalijali

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 16, 2022
2:22-cv-00605-JDP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00605-JDP

09-16-2022

LANCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JEHOSHUA JALIJALI, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JALIJALI AND DEFENDANT LACROIX'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se. Defendant Jalijali and Defendant Lacroix filed a request for extension of time to file a responsive pleading.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading is GRANTED; and

2. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading no later than thirty days after the Court renders a decision on their motion to revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis (IFP) status, or, if granted, thirty days after Defendants receive notice that Plaintiff paid the filing fee or has otherwise been granted leave to continue proceeding IFP.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Jalijali

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 16, 2022
2:22-cv-00605-JDP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. Jalijali

Case Details

Full title:LANCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JEHOSHUA JALIJALI, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 16, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00605-JDP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2022)