From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. J Adore Les Fleurs Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 19, 2024
CV 24-4821 PA (BFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-4821 PA (BFMx)

07-19-2024

Latanya Williams v. J Adore Les Fleurs, Inc,. et al.

Kamilla Sali-Suleyman


Kamilla Sali-Suleyman

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before July 26, 2024, why Defendant J Adore Les Fleurs Inc. should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. J Adore Les Fleurs Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 19, 2024
CV 24-4821 PA (BFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Williams v. J Adore Les Fleurs Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Latanya Williams v. J Adore Les Fleurs, Inc,. et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 19, 2024

Citations

CV 24-4821 PA (BFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2024)