From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 27, 2012
Case Number: 1:11cv362 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:11cv362

12-27-2012

Ronald Williams, II, Plaintiff(s), v. C. Harris, et al., Defendant(s).


Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott


ORDER

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on August 2, 2012 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 35) and defendants filed a response to the objections (Doc. 36).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 24) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed based upon his inadequate exhaustion prior to filing suit and this case is hereby CLOSED.

The Plaintiff's request for judgment against Defendant Hansford (Doc. 25) and Defendants' motion to strike (Doc. 29) are both DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott

United States District Court


Summaries of

Williams v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 27, 2012
Case Number: 1:11cv362 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:Ronald Williams, II, Plaintiff(s), v. C. Harris, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 27, 2012

Citations

Case Number: 1:11cv362 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 27, 2012)

Citing Cases

Wilcox v. Ohio

. (internal quotation and quotation marks omitted), report and recommendation adopted, No. 1:11-cv-362,…

Brown v. Gray

While the exhaustion requirement is mandatory, the Sixth Circuit has held that "'[w]hen prison officials…