Williams v. Harrington

Full title: RANDY WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Dec 8, 2010

CV 06-6367-VBF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2010)

Opinion

RANDY WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 06-6367-VBF (JEM). United States District Court, C.D. California. December 8, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.