From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Faught

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Aug 10, 2023
6:23-cv-00218 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2023)

Opinion

6:23-cv-00218

08-10-2023

Jay Williams, Plaintiff, v. David Faught, Defendant.


ORDER

J. Campbell Barker, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Jay Williams, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil-rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without paying the filing fee or moving to proceed in forma pauperis. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

On June 20, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that plaintiff be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis and this case be dismissed without prejudice because of plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to comply with the court's order to either pay the fee or file a properly supported motion to proceed as a pauper. Doc. 4. A copy of the report was mailed to plaintiff, who did not file written objections.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Plaintiff is denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and this case is dismissed.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Williams v. Faught

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Aug 10, 2023
6:23-cv-00218 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Williams v. Faught

Case Details

Full title:Jay Williams, Plaintiff, v. David Faught, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Aug 10, 2023

Citations

6:23-cv-00218 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 10, 2023)