From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Fackrell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 26, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2291 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2291 JAM EFB P

04-26-2013

CURTIS J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. C. FACKRELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 20, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 20, 2013, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants Hanks, Carter, Lindsey, Baron and Robinette Bauer are dismissed without prejudice.

John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Fackrell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 26, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2291 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. Fackrell

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. C. FACKRELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 26, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2291 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2013)