From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Brewen

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 29, 2023
22-cv-04695-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-04695-RS (PR)

03-29-2023

REGINALD M. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. BREWEN, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RICHARD SEEBORG, Chief United States District Judge.

Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint by the deadline. Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the Court's order, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action.

Any such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page, and (ii) contain an amended complaint that complies in all respects with the order dismissing the complaint with leave to amend. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Brewen

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 29, 2023
22-cv-04695-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2023)
Case details for

Williams v. Brewen

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD M. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. BREWEN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 29, 2023

Citations

22-cv-04695-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2023)