From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Birkholz

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Sep 13, 2021
20-cv-2190 (ECT/LIB) (D. Minn. Sep. 13, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-2190 (ECT/LIB)

09-13-2021

Larry Williams, et al., Petitioners, v. B. Birkholz, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court Judge

Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation on July 20, 2021. ECF No. 16. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 16] is ACCEPTED.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and Request for Emergency Order of Enlargement [ECF No. 1] is DENIED without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Williams v. Birkholz

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Sep 13, 2021
20-cv-2190 (ECT/LIB) (D. Minn. Sep. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Williams v. Birkholz

Case Details

Full title:Larry Williams, et al., Petitioners, v. B. Birkholz, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Sep 13, 2021

Citations

20-cv-2190 (ECT/LIB) (D. Minn. Sep. 13, 2021)