From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Sep 30, 2019
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-01077-TLW (D.S.C. Sep. 30, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-01077-TLW

09-30-2019

Lorriann Williams, Plaintiff, v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court for review of Counsel for Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. ECF No. 28. The Commissioner filed a notice that the government does not object to EAJA fees in the amount of four thousand seven hundred thirty-nine dollars and forty-four cents ($4,739.44) in attorney's fees and sixteen dollars ($16.00) in expenses. ECF No. 29. The attorney's fees are based upon a remand to the Commissioner for further administrative action in this case.

Under the EAJA, a court shall award attorney's fees to a prevailing party in certain civil actions against the United States unless the court finds that the government's position was substantially justified or special circumstances make an award unjust. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). To determine whether the Commissioner was "substantially justified" in denying social security benefits and thus whether an award of attorney's fees under the EAJA is warranted, the court asks whether there was arguably substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's position. Anderson v. Heckler, 756 F.2d 1011 (4th Cir. 1984). An EAJA attorney's fees award is payable to the litigant and, therefore, is subject to an offset to satisfy the litigant's pre-existing debt to the Government. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 594 (2010).

After careful consideration of the record and the applicable legal authority, the Court concludes that the requested fees should be awarded. As noted, the Commissioner does not object to the amounts of $4,739.44 and $16.00, to be offset by the amount of Plaintiff's pre-existing federal debts. See Astrue, 560 U.S. at 594.

Having reviewed the filings and being fully advised, it is ORDERED that the motion for attorney's fees under the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, ECF No. 28, is GRANTED, and the Commissioner is ordered to award Plaintiff $4,755.44, offset by his pre-existing federal debts, for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Terry L. Wooten

Terry L. Wooten

Senior United States District Judge September 30, 2019
Columbia, South Carolina


Summaries of

Williams v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Sep 30, 2019
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-01077-TLW (D.S.C. Sep. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Williams v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:Lorriann Williams, Plaintiff, v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 30, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-01077-TLW (D.S.C. Sep. 30, 2019)