From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Belova

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 23, 2014
121 A.D.3d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

13277 8006/07

10-23-2014

Brian K. Williams, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Irina Belova, Defendant, America's Wholesale Lender, Defendant-Appellant.

Delbello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP, White Plains (Bradley D. Wank of counsel), for appellant. Joseph A. Altman, Bronx, for respondent.


, Sweeny, Acosta, Saxe, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Delbello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP, White Plains (Bradley D. Wank of counsel), for appellant.

Joseph A. Altman, Bronx, for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered on April 6, 2012, which, inter alia, denied defendant America's Wholesale Lender's motion for a money judgment against plaintiff, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of granting said defendant a money judgment in the amount of $63,099.40, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

The so-ordered stipulation, dated January 14, 2008, executed by counsel, constitutes a binding contract which requires plaintiff to make monthly use and occupancy payments to America's Wholesale Lender (AWL), which lender issued two mortgages against property owned and/or occupied by plaintiff (see CPLR 2104). While these payments were to be made to AWL's counsel, there were no restrictions on AWL's use of the moneys, which were not required to be placed in escrow. To the contrary, the payments were to be made "on account of the mortgage indebtedness."

As plaintiff does not dispute the validity of the stipulation, or deny that the stipulation unequivocally required him to make monthly use and occupancy payments, he provides no basis to avoid the ramifications of noncompliance (see Hallock v State of New York , 64 NY2d 224 [1984]). However, the court correctly found that plaintiff's obligation to make such payments began with execution of the stipulation and was not retroactive.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 23, 2014

CLERK


Summaries of

Williams v. Belova

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 23, 2014
121 A.D.3d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Williams v. Belova

Case Details

Full title:Brian K. Williams, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Irina Belova, Defendant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 23, 2014

Citations

121 A.D.3d 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 7273
993 N.Y.S.2d 907

Citing Cases

Garrido v. Fermin

With regard to the prior inconsistent verdict, the default rules of summary jury trials state that "the trial…

Darlene W. v. Montefiore Med. Ctr.

Plaintiff does not dispute that the prior action was properly removed to federal court (see 28 USC § 1446 [d]…