From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Baca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 14, 2013
3:12-cv-00625-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2013)

Opinion

3:12-cv-00625-LRH-VPC

03-14-2013

RICKELL WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. ISIDRO BACA, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

On January 28, 2013, the court dismissed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus without prejudice for lack of exhaustion because petitioner's fast-track appeal was pending before the Nevada Supreme Court (ECF #3).

Petitioner has now filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis in this closed case (ECF #5). The court notes that the application is incomplete; the financial certificate has not been completed and signed by an authorized officer, and the inmate account statements are missing.

Petitioner has also filed a motion for relief from order (ECF #6). While petitioner's motion is disrespectful of the court, it also appears to attempt to rebut caselaw and arguments that were not discussed or referenced in any way in this court's order. The court can discern no basis whatsoever to grant any reconsideration from its order dismissing this petition.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF #5) and his motion for relief from order (ECF #6) are both DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall file no more documents in this closed case, and the Clerk of the Court shall not docket any documents received in the future.

________________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Baca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 14, 2013
3:12-cv-00625-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. Baca

Case Details

Full title:RICKELL WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. ISIDRO BACA, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

3:12-cv-00625-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2013)