Opinion
SC: 160690
07-28-2020
Tajuan WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
Order
On order of the Court, the plaintiff-appellant's motion to disqualify the entire Court from deciding the pending motion for reconsideration is DENIED pursuant to the rule of necessity. United States v. Will , 449 U.S. 200, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980). The plaintiff-appellant's alternative request to disqualify Justices Markman, Zahra, and Viviano is DENIED because those Justices believe, and the other Justices concur, there is no basis for their disqualification under MCR 2.003. The motion for reconsideration of this Court's April 29, 2020 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G). The motion to appoint counsel is DENIED.
Cavanagh, J., did not participate due to her prior service as a member of the Attorney Grievance Commission.