From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jul 14, 2009
Case No. 3:08cv00168 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 14, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08cv00168.

July 14, 2009


DECISION AND ENTRY


The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #12), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on June 25, 2009 (Doc. #12) is ADOPTED in full;
2. The Commissioner's non-disability determination is vacated;
3. No finding is made regarding whether Plaintiff Chris Williams is under a "disability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act;
4. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this case is remanded to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and an Administrative Law Judge for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and with the Report and Recommendations (Doc. #12); and
5. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court.


Summaries of

Williams v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jul 14, 2009
Case No. 3:08cv00168 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 14, 2009)
Case details for

Williams v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CHRIS WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Jul 14, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:08cv00168 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 14, 2009)

Citing Cases

Mercer v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

The starting point of this analysis is always the rationale provided by the ALJ, since the Court must rely on…

Hannon v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

The starting point of this analysis is always the rationale provided by the ALJ, since the Court must rely on…