From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

William v. First Transit Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 1, 2024
2:24-cv-00137-RGK-MARx (C.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00137-RGK-MARx

02-01-2024

Brian William v. First Transit Inc. et al


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing by February 12, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to certain defendant/s.

Alternative Response

Response Due Date

As to Defendant/s:

Proof of timely service of summons and operative complaint

X

Response to the operative Complaint

2/8/2024

Firstgroup America Inc. Americanos U.S.A. L.L.C. Bradley Thomas, individual and official capacity David S. Leach, individual and official capacity Jose Luis Moreno, individual and official capacity Jane Doe Greyhound Supervisor, individual and official capacity

X

If defendant fails to respond on the date above, Plaintiff's application for entry of default by clerk pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

2/12/2024

Firstgroup America Inc. Americanos U.S.A. L.L.C. Bradley Thomas, individual and official capacity David S. Leach, individual and official capacity Jose Luis Moreno, individual and official capacity Jane Doe Greyhound Supervisor, individual and official capacity

Plaintiff's motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

If a atisfactory response is not timely filed, the matter or the listed defendants will be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A stipulation to extend dates or a notice of settlement do not constitute a proper response to this order.

Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument.

Plaintiff to serve this order on any non-appearing defendant/s who have been formally served.

The Order to Show Cause issued on January 12, 2024 [15] is hereby discharged.


Summaries of

William v. First Transit Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 1, 2024
2:24-cv-00137-RGK-MARx (C.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2024)
Case details for

William v. First Transit Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Brian William v. First Transit Inc. et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 1, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-00137-RGK-MARx (C.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2024)