From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willard v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jun 15, 1962
358 S.W.2d 516 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962)

Opinion

June 15, 1962.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lyon County, Ira D. Smith, J.,

Milton Willard, pro se.

John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen., Ray Corns, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.


Milton Willard, a prisoner in the Eddyville Penitentiary, became eligible for parole. He made his application to the Parole Board and subsequently appeared for hearing before the Board.

The Board denied the parole and ordered that any further application be deferred for forty-eight months. He brought this action in the Lyon Circuit Court to prohibit and enjoin enforcement of the Board's deferment order. The trial court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and Willard appeals.

It must be kept in mind that parole is a matter of legislative grace and that the general assembly may impose such limitations, restrictions and conditions as it deems best for society. It may likewise invest the Board with power to make rules. and regulations with respect to eligibility.

The General Assembly by KRS 439.330 has limited the right of review to questions of compliance with the parole act. We have examined the record and fail to find any non-compliance with respect to Milton Willard's application for parole.

The trial court properly dismissed the action and the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Willard v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jun 15, 1962
358 S.W.2d 516 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962)
Case details for

Willard v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:Milton WILLARD, Appellant, v. Walter FERGUSON, Chairman, State Board of…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Jun 15, 1962

Citations

358 S.W.2d 516 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962)

Citing Cases

Tyler v. State Department of Public Welfare

paroling authority, whether it be a court or an officer, board, or commission. Under the statutes and…

Roberson v. Fla. Parole Probation Com'n

Looking beyond our own jurisdiction, we find that appellate review of parole decisions is nothing new or…