From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilkins v. Magat

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 9, 2018
Case No. 15-cv-01706-YGR (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 15-cv-01706-YGR (PR)

08-09-2018

RUDY WILKINS, Plaintiff, v. MARIA MAGAT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF HIS THIRD AND FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Rudy Wilkins, a state prisoner who is currently housed at San Quentin State Prison ("SQSP"), filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 regarding alleged violations of his federal rights.

In December 2016, Defendants initially moved for summary judgment, which Plaintiff opposed. See Dkts. 65, 75. The Court denied the motion for summary judgment without prejudice while discovery disputes were being resolved. Dkt. 94. On May 9, 2018, Defendants filed their second motion for summary judgment. Dkt. 124. Plaintiff's opposition was due no later than June 6, 2018. See Dkt. 117 at 7. On June 11, 2018, Plaintiff moved for an extension of time to file his opposition, citing health issues. Dkt. 133. The Court granted a 35-day extension, allowing him to file an opposition no later than July 11, 2018. Dkt. 134. On July 5, 2018, Plaintiff moved for a second extension of time, claiming that he had no law library access due to a "[m]odified program, shutdown" at SQSP. Dkt. 135. The Court extended the deadline to July 31, 2018 and ordered that no further extensions would be granted "absent extraordinary circumstances." Dkt. 136. According to Plaintiff, the aforementioned "modified lockdown" ended on July 17, 2018. Dkt. 137 at 1.

To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition even though, as mentioned above, he has been granted two extensions of time to do so. See Dkts. 134, 136. His last opposition deadline of July 31, 2018 has passed. See Dkt. 136 at 1.

Before the Court is Plaintiff's request for a third extension of time in which to file his opposition to Defendants' second motion for summary judgment. Dkt. 137. Plaintiff explains that, as of July 30, 2018, the prison was placed on "modified program for two days" due to "several violent assault incidents [of] inmates attacking . . . each other" in his dorm. Id. at 1-2. Plaintiff also claims his law library access has been limited since June 28, 2018. Id. at 2. He requests another extension of time up to and including August 20, 2018 in which to file his opposition. Id. Defendants oppose Plaintiff's request. Dkt. 138.

The Court finds that Plaintiff may be granted another brief third and final extension of time to file his opposition to Defendants' second motion for summary judgment. The time in which Plaintiff may file his opposition to Defendants' dispositive motion will be extended up to and including August 20, 2018. Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after the date Plaintiff's opposition is filed.

This is Plaintiff's final extension , and no further extensions will be granted .

This Order terminates Docket No. 137.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 9, 2018

/s/_________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wilkins v. Magat

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 9, 2018
Case No. 15-cv-01706-YGR (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Wilkins v. Magat

Case Details

Full title:RUDY WILKINS, Plaintiff, v. MARIA MAGAT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 9, 2018

Citations

Case No. 15-cv-01706-YGR (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2018)