Summary
In Wilkes, the New York Court of Appeals held in a one-page opinion that the then-prevailing version of § 3212(c)(1) prevented the defendant insurer from offsetting future disability benefits due on six life insurance policies to recover a judgment awarded based on the insured's fraud with respect to three other policies.
Summary of this case from Lessard v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Opinion
Argued March 17, 1942
Decided July 29, 1942
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, SCHMUCK, J.
Copal Mintz for appellant.
James D. Ewing and William R. McDermott for respondent.
This action was instituted to recover disability benefits under nine life insurance contracts. The disability of plaintiff was conceded and no defense was interposed as to six of the policies. The defendant alleged by way of defenses and counterclaims that the issuance of the disability provisions of the other three policies had been procured by false and untrue representations. Those defenses and counterclaims were established. The judgment rescinded the disability provisions in the three policies, declared them lapsed for non-payment of premiums (those which would have been properly waived during disability had there been no falsity of representation), awarded defendant $12,300 for disability payments theretofore made, less the disability payments due plaintiff on the six unchallenged policies and costs and authorized the defendant to apply future disability benefits on those six policies toward satisfaction of the judgment. The Appellate Division modified by providing that the three policies should lapse only if the accrued premiums were not promptly paid and by correcting a mathematical error in the amount of the judgment.
We find merit in but one of appellant's contentions. The defendant may not be permitted to collect its money award out of the disability benefits already due or as they become due under the six uncontested policies. That would be violative of chapter 626 of the Laws of 1934, now in substance embodied in subdivisions 2 and 5 of section 166 (formerly § 55-b) of the Insurance Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 28), providing that no disability benefits "shall be liable to execution, attachment, garnishment, or other process, or to be seized, taken, appropriated or applied by any legal or equitable process or operation of law, to pay any debt or liability of such insured person * * *."
The judgment should be modified in accordance with this opinion and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the appellant.
LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS and DESMOND, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.