From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilkerson v. Wilkerson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 27, 1983
430 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. AN-150.

April 27, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Walton County, Clyde W. Wells, J.

Gillis E. Powell, Sr. of Powell, Powell Powell, Niceville, for appellant.

George Ralph Miller, DeFuniak Springs, for appellee.


In this appeal from a final order modifying the final judgment of dissolution, appellant contends the trial court erred in granting appellee's petition to modify child support; ordering continued support for the minor daughter to age 21; denying appellant's motion to terminate alimony; and refusing to allow appellant to post an appeal bond which would operate retroactively to cover all sums including those due before the appellant applied for the bond. No reversible error was committed except as to the second point raised regarding continuing support to age 21 for the minor daughter. The remaining three points are affirmed.

The original dissolution occurred in 1975, thus the applicable age of majority for the children is 18 rather than 21. See Section 743.07, Florida Statutes (1973); Mohammad v. Mohammad, 371 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Under these circumstances there is no obligation to support the child after she reaches age 18 absent a finding of dependency, and attendance at college does not necessarily render a person dependent, see Slaton v. Slaton, 428 So.2d 347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Jones v. Jones, 421 So.2d 815 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Dwyer v. Dwyer, 327 So.2d 74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Krogen v. Krogen, 320 So.2d 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). The trial court thus erred in ordering continued support for the 15 year old daughter until she "reaches age twenty-one (21), marries, dies, or ceases formal education for a period in excess of four months, or otherwise becomes self-supporting." The cases relied upon by appellee are distinguishable in that they involved pre-1973 dissolutions in which college expenses did not present the problem of post-majority support, see Jones v. Jones, 405 So.2d 775, 777 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (concurring opinion).

The final order is REVERSED in part and AFFIRMED in part.

MILLS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wilkerson v. Wilkerson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 27, 1983
430 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Wilkerson v. Wilkerson

Case Details

Full title:BUDDY GENE WILKERSON, APPELLANT, v. BARBARA ANN WILKERSON, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 27, 1983

Citations

430 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Reeves v. Reeves

Grapin v. Grapin, 450 So.2d 853 (Fla. 1984); Leaird v. Leaird, 540 So.2d 243 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); French v.…

Haskew v. Haskew

Section 743.07, Florida Statutes (1973), which lowered the age of majority to eighteen, took effect on July…