Summary
In Wilkerson v. Watkins, No. 3:13-CV-1326-M, 2013 WL 6602861 (N.D. Tex. Dec. 16, 2013), it was noted that he had previously filed numerous suits in federal court as a plaintiff based on the same criminal prosecutions at issue in this habeas case.
Summary of this case from Wilkerson v. McComisOpinion
No. 3:13-cv-1326-M (BF)
12-16-2013
SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG M. WATKINS, Defendant.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated November 20, 2013, the Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted. Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 94) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. In addition, Plaintiff is sanctioned $200.00 and barred from filing any other actions, motions, or pleadings of any kind challenging his conviction without first obtaining the permission of a district judge or magistrate judge.
_______________________
BARBARA M. G. LYNN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS