From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilkerson v. Graulty

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Jan 15, 2002
24674 (Haw. Jan. 15, 2002)

Opinion

24674

January 15, 2002.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 98-1135).


ORDER


Upon consideration of Petitioner Donald Wilkerson's petition for a writ of mandamus, writ of prohibition and writ of habeas corpus, the papers in support, and the records and files herein, it appears that: (1) the respondent judge refused to file Petitioner's motion to recall bench warrant submitted for filing on November 9, 2001; and (2) a court's refusal to file documents submitted to the court for filing is reviewable by way of a petition for writ of mandamus. See Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Haw. 109, 929 P.2d 1359 (1996). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of this order, the respondents shall file a response to Petitioner's assertion that the respondent judge refused to file Petitioner's motion to recall bench warrant. Notwithstanding the provision in HRAP Rule 21(c), the respondent judge shall file a response to the petition. Petitioner may file a supplemental memorandum or other supplemental materials within the time provided.


Summaries of

Wilkerson v. Graulty

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Jan 15, 2002
24674 (Haw. Jan. 15, 2002)
Case details for

Wilkerson v. Graulty

Case Details

Full title:DONALD L. WILKERSON, Petitioner v. THE HONORABLE REYNALDO GRAULTY, Judge…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Jan 15, 2002

Citations

24674 (Haw. Jan. 15, 2002)