From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilkens v. Ward

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Aug 22, 2007
Case No. CIV-05-254-M (W.D. Okla. Aug. 22, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-05-254-M.

August 22, 2007


ORDER


On July 31, 2007, United States Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch issued a Supplemental Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of plaintiff's constitutional rights. The Magistrate Judge recommended that defendants' second motion for summary judgment be granted, plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment be denied, judgment in favor of defendants on each of plaintiff's federal law claims be entered, and plaintiff's pendent state law claims of negligence be dismissed without prejudice. The parties were advised of their right to object to the Supplemental Report and Recommendation by August 20, 2007. On August 20, 2007, plaintiff filed her objection, objecting to the Supplemental Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Having carefully reviewed this matter de novo, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the Supplemental Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on July 31, 2007;
(2) DENIES plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [docket nos. 106 and 107];
(3) GRANTS defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment [docket no. 97];
(4) ORDERS that judgment issue forthwith in favor of defendants and against plaintiff on each of plaintiff's federal law claims; and
(5) DISMISSES plaintiff's pendent state law claims of negligence without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wilkens v. Ward

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Aug 22, 2007
Case No. CIV-05-254-M (W.D. Okla. Aug. 22, 2007)
Case details for

Wilkens v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:APRIL ROSE WILKENS, Plaintiff, v. RON WARD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 22, 2007

Citations

Case No. CIV-05-254-M (W.D. Okla. Aug. 22, 2007)

Citing Cases

Pipes v. U.S.

Other courts, however, have held or suggested that following an extraction-only policy would not violate the…

Mounce v. Doe

"On the other hand, a number of courts have held that prison policies that offer extraction in lieu of such…