Wiley v. Hurley

Full title: CLARENCE WILEY, Petitioner, v. PATRICK HURLEY, Warden, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 25, 2006

Case No. 2:05-cv-698 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 25, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-cv-698.

April 25, 2006

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE SMITH, District Judge

On February 28, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner objects to all of the Magistrate Judge's recommendations. Petitioner again raises all of the same arguments that were previously presented.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation objected to. For the reasons discussed in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED.