From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wiley v. Banks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 3, 2013
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-99 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 3, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:13-CV-99

07-03-2013

SHAWN WILEY, Petitioner, v. EDWARD BANKS, WARDEN, Respondent.


JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP


OPINION AND ORDER

On April 17, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases denying Petitioner's Motion for a Stay and request for counsel (Doc. Nos. 4, 5), and recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. The parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so. Additionally, the Court granted Petitioner's request for an extension of time to file his objections. Doc. No. 9 No objections, however, have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Petitioner's Motion for a Stay, Doc. No. 4, and request for counsel, Doc. No. 5, are DENIED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

ALGENON L. MARBLEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wiley v. Banks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 3, 2013
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-99 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Wiley v. Banks

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN WILEY, Petitioner, v. EDWARD BANKS, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 3, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:13-CV-99 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 3, 2013)