From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilder v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
May 17, 2017
Case No. 8:16-cv-1111-T-33MAP (M.D. Fla. May. 17, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 8:16-cv-1111-T-33MAP

05-17-2017

MARISA RAE WILDER, Plaintiff, v. NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 17), filed on May 2, 2017, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying SSI benefits be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings. As of this date, neither party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for the parties to file such objections has elapsed.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982).

In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Hous. v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 17) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. (2) The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying benefits is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. (3) The Clerk is directed to enter a Judgment in favor of the Plaintiff reflecting that the Commissioner's decision denying benefits is reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings. Thereafter, the Clerk is directed to CLOSE THE CASE. (4) The matter of fees and costs shall be addressed upon further pleadings.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 17th day of May, 2017.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wilder v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
May 17, 2017
Case No. 8:16-cv-1111-T-33MAP (M.D. Fla. May. 17, 2017)
Case details for

Wilder v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:MARISA RAE WILDER, Plaintiff, v. NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: May 17, 2017

Citations

Case No. 8:16-cv-1111-T-33MAP (M.D. Fla. May. 17, 2017)