From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilder Corp. of Delaware v. Adkins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 29, 1994
647 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 92-3757.

November 29, 1994.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims; Charles C. Hurt, Judge.

Valerie A. Marshall, of Jeffery Marshall, P.A., Maitland, for appellants.

Celia M. Mendez, of Moreland Mendez, P.A., Maitland, for appellee.


We reverse that portion of the judge of compensation claims' order requiring the employer/carrier to provide to the claimant an evaluation and treatment by an ophthalmologist. The claimant concedes that the claim for ophthalmological treatment was withdrawn at the merits hearing. Accordingly, that specific provision should be stricken on remand. We conclude that the order should be affirmed in all other respects, as the judge of compensation claims made sufficient findings supported by competent substantial evidence in the record.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.

BOOTH, WOLF and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wilder Corp. of Delaware v. Adkins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 29, 1994
647 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Wilder Corp. of Delaware v. Adkins

Case Details

Full title:WILDER CORPORATION OF DELAWARE AND ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 29, 1994

Citations

647 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)