From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wild v. Isaiah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 2010
72 A.D.3d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-04990.

April 13, 2010.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), entered April 13, 2009, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Molod Spitz DeSantis, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Marcy Sonneborn and Salvatore J. DeSantis of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established, prima facie, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint ( see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557).


Summaries of

Wild v. Isaiah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 2010
72 A.D.3d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Wild v. Isaiah

Case Details

Full title:LEANORE WILD, Appellant, v. TEMPLE ISAIAH, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 2010

Citations

72 A.D.3d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 3116
898 N.Y.S.2d 479