From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilburn v. Diann

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cv-01153-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 1:18-cv-01153-DAD-EPG

10-24-2018

DEBORAH ANN WILBURN, Plaintiff, v. ROSE MARIE DIANN, Defendant.


ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF NO. 4)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF No. 5)

Deborah Ann Wilburn ("Plaintiff") is proceeding pro se in this action. (ECF No. 1). On August 27, 2018, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 2), which the Court denied without prejudice, (ECF No. 3). The Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis within fourteen days. Id. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended application, and on October 5, 2018, the Court issued findings and recommendation recommending that this action be dismissed. (ECF No. 4). \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\

On October 22, 2018, Plaintiff filed an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 5.) In her amended application, Plaintiff makes the requisite showing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, her application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED, and the findings and recommendations issued on October 5, 2018, (ECF No. 4), are VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24 , 2018

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Wilburn v. Diann

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cv-01153-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2018)
Case details for

Wilburn v. Diann

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH ANN WILBURN, Plaintiff, v. ROSE MARIE DIANN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 24, 2018

Citations

Case No. 1:18-cv-01153-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2018)