From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wiesner v. Wiesner

Supreme Court of Nevada.
May 9, 2011
373 P.3d 973 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 58045.

05-09-2011

Deann WIESNER, Appellant, v. Daniel WIESNER, Respondent.

DeAnn Wiesner Daniel Wiesner


DeAnn Wiesner

Daniel Wiesner

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Proper person appellant seeks to challenge a district court order extending a temporary protective order. As no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from a temporary protective order, the challenged order is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken); see also In re Five Minors, 102 Nev. 521, 728 P.2d 1357 (1986) ; Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). As we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

In light of this order, we deny as moot appellant's motion for remand on April 18, 2011.


Summaries of

Wiesner v. Wiesner

Supreme Court of Nevada.
May 9, 2011
373 P.3d 973 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Wiesner v. Wiesner

Case Details

Full title:Deann WIESNER, Appellant, v. Daniel WIESNER, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: May 9, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 973 (Nev. 2011)