From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wiesner v. Vic Tanny Gyms, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 7, 1963
18 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

January 7, 1963


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury allegedly sustained when plaintiff was thrown from a vibrating machine in a gymnasium on the premises of the defendant Vic Tanny Queens, Inc., said defendant and the defendants Vic Tanny Gyms, Inc., and Vic Tanny, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 7, 1962, which denied the motion made by them and one other defendant for summary judgment dismissing the second amended complaint (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements (see Grande v. Torello, 12 A.D.2d 937; Krohn v. Steinlauf, 11 A.D.2d 695, 696). Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wiesner v. Vic Tanny Gyms, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 7, 1963
18 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Wiesner v. Vic Tanny Gyms, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DIANA E. WIESNER, Also Known as DIANA D. DUBROFF, Respondent, v. VIC TANNY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 7, 1963

Citations

18 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)