From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wieland-Werke AG v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Aug 12, 2008
290 F. App'x 348 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2008-1141.

August 12, 2008.

On Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade, in Case No(s). 06-00135.

Michael T. Shor, Arnold Porter, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

Charles A. St. Charles, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. With him on the brief were James M. Lyons, General Counsel, and Andrea C. Casson, Assistant General Counsel for Litigation.

Kathleen W. Cannon, Kelley Drye Warren, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Eagle Brass Co., et al. With her on the brief were David A. Hartquist and Jeffrey S. Beckington.

MAYER, LOURIE and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.


Judgment


This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir.R. 36.


Summaries of

Wieland-Werke AG v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Aug 12, 2008
290 F. App'x 348 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Wieland-Werke AG v. United States

Case Details

Full title:WIELAND-WERKE AG, Prymetall GMBH Co. KG, Schwermetall Halbzeugwerk GMBH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 12, 2008

Citations

290 F. App'x 348 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

NSK Corp. v. United States

The term "likely" means "probable" or "more likely than not," and requires more than mere possibility.…

AK Steel Corp. v. United States

III. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Material Injury “After making the threshold determination…